Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Fraud and Asset Transfer Cases Under Companies Act 2013: Court Stresses Timely Complaints and Continuing Offense Implications.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Misappropriation of funds/ assets/ shares/ stocks of the said company - illegally transferring of company assets - fraud - the Delhi High Court addressed the legal complexities surrounding the cognizance of offenses under the Companies Act 2013. The Court delineated the specific conditions under which offenses like fraud (Section 447) and loans to directors (Section 185) could be prosecuted, emphasizing the need for complaints to be lodged by designated authorities and within stipulated time frames. It also clarified the concept of continuing offenses with respect to wrongful withholding of company property (Section 452), which impacts the calculation of the limitation period. - The High Court set aside the cognizance due to improper initiation and expiration of the limitation period.....