Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1955 (12) TMI 54

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ry sanction filed a second charge sheet on the same facts. The petitioner submitted before the trial Court that the second prosecution was barred under Section 403, Cr.P.C. and the trial Court held that inasmuch as no sanction had been produced at the time when the previous trial commenced there was nothing to bar a second prosecution. The trial of the case, therefore, proceeded. 2. The contention of the petitioner before us is that the second prosecution was illegal under Article 20(2) of the Constitution. It is urged that the petitioner on a prior occasion was prosecuted and punished and having regard to the express terms of Article 20(2) of the Constitution a second prosecution was incompetent. The Article referred to above which appear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... be prosecuted as well as punished. The words therein are 'prosecuted and punished'. The words are conjunctive. It would not do if he was merely prosecuted and not punished. It was urged by the learned advocate for the petitioner that the petitioner, after the conviction by the trial Court and before the matter was disposed of by the Sessions Court, had undergone some portion of the sentence of imprisonment; therefore, having undergone punishment he could not again be prosecuted and punished. An accused obtaining a reversal of the order of the trial Court on appeal is estopped from pleading previous conviction although the accused at the time of the reversal had served out a part of his sentence. In this connection we might advert....