2000 (9) TMI 1093

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s is a suit for specific performance filed by Gurbir Singh Ghuman against M/s Dau-lat Industries Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Civil Lines, Opposite Police Lines, Ludhiana in the year 1987 through its Managing Director Shri Ramesh Kumar on the basis of agreement dated 29.10.84 alleged to have been executed by the latter in his favour. 2. During the pendency of the suit, one Satish Kumar made applicati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tiala Division, Patiala. It is further alleged that after the purchase of the property, he constructed one Generator room, two servant quarters, two drawing rooms, eight bed rooms, two lobbies, two stores, two kitchens, four bath rooms, one verandah and is residing there with his father and elder brother and other members of the family. Mutation has also been sanctioned in his name. In the house t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....udge. Ludhiana declined the application of Satish Kumar filed under Order 1 Rule 10 read with section 151 CPC for an order to be impleaded as defendant. It is this order which has been called in question by Satish Kumar through this revision. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC lays down as follows :- "10(2) Court may strike out or add parties - The Court may at any stage of the proceedings, either upon ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rchased this property. 5. From the provisions of Order 1 Rule 10, it is quite clear that any body who has some interest in the subject matter of the suit should be impleaded as a party as his presence will enable the Court to adjudicate upon the rival claims more effectually and completely. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that in Smt. Saita Bala Dassi v. Smt. Nirmata Sundari Dass a....