1991 (4) TMI 466
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s ordered to be arrayed as defendant in the suit. 2. The Petitioner filed a suit on 12-6-1987 for specific performance of agreement dated 15-5-1986 and for permanent injunction restraining defendant No. 1 from alienating her share in the suit property. Satinderjit Singh was arrayed as defendant No. 2 in the suit. After defendant No. 1 admitted the claim of the Plaintiff, the latter prayed that ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....allowing the application of Satinderjit Singh for being impleaded as a party to the suit. He further submitted that no relief had been claimed against Satinderjit Singh and thus, the order passed by the trial Court be quashed. 5. I have considered the submission made by the counsel for the Petitioner and do not find and merit therein. The Petitioner filed the present suit on 12-6-1987 and it is....
TaxTMI