2024 (4) TMI 776

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....akkaravarthi For the R1 : Mr. R. Sureshkumar Additional Government Pleader For the R2 : Mr. P. Pethu Rajesh Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner has challenged the impugned communication dated 03.06.2022, bearing reference Na.Ka.No.A8/1944/2021, issued by the first respondent attaching the petitioner's bank account with the second respondent Bank. 2. Earlier, the petitioner had suffered ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0 to 23452 of 2023 and remitted the case back to the authorities. The relevant portion of the said order reads as under:- ''4. Therefore, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned orders challenged in all the writ petitions and accordingly, the impugned orders in W.P(MD)Nos.23450 to 23452 of 2023 are quashed and the matter is remitted back to the authorities. The authorities are s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....osed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.'' 3. Despite the orders arising out of assessment periods from July, 2017 to March, 2018; April, 2018 to March, 2019; and April, 2019 to March, 2020 being set aside as early as 26.09.2023, the impugned bank attachment order dated 03.06.2022, continues to remain in operation. The petitioner should have brought the ....