2024 (4) TMI 660

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... S. Pikale,. For the Respondent No. 1: Mr. Shreeram Shirsat, Spl.P.P a/w Mr. Shekhar Mane and Ms. Tanvi Mate,. For the Respondent No. 2- State : Ms. P. S. Rane, A.P.P. ORAL J UDGMENT   (PER REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith, with the consent of the parties and is taken up for final disposal. Mr. Shi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... aside by the Delhi High Court vide order dated 7th February 2008 passed in Writ Petition No. 442 of 1997. It is also not in dispute that the Detaining Authority had challenged the order of the Delhi High Court in the Apex Court by filing a Criminal Appeal being Criminal Appeal No. 1177 of 2009. However, the Apex Court vide order dated 11th February 2015 dismissed the SLP filed by the Union of Ind....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion order passed by the Delhi High Court. Mr. Shirsat, also does not dispute that in view of the aforesaid, the attachment of the properties under SAFEMA, will not survive. 7. Accordingly, in view of the aforesaid and the judgments in respect of the same, the petition is allowed on the following terms and conditions:- ORDER (i) The impugned order dated 3rd February 2000 passed by th....