2024 (4) TMI 339
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Mr. Lakshay Virvani and Ms. Pranaya Sahay, Advs. For the Respondents Through: Mr. Jatin Kumar Gaur, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel. JUDGMENT ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 10344/2024 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2718/2024, CRL.M.A. 10345/2024 1. Petition under Section 482 of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the respondents/department sought time to file original documents and the matter was listed for 04.12.2023. However, thereafter, the matter was again taken up at 12.35 pm, whereby the documents filed on behalf of the department/respondents were taken on record and the matter was directed to be taken up on date already fixed i.e., 04.12.2023. 4. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the peti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1 for payment of differential customs duty alongwith penalty under Section 114A, 114AA and 112(a)(ii) & b(ii) of the Act respectively. The aforesaid order was challenged by the petitioners before CESTAT, Delhi by way of appeal and the order passed by Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import), ICD was remanded back vide order dated 13.12.2022. After remand, Principal Commissioner of Customs (Im....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... ACMM by the petitioners for consideration as the summons could not have been issued without any specific orders/directions for summoning the petitioners. However, in case the learned ACMM is of the opinion that the summons have been issued in accordance with law, petitioners shall be at liberty to file the proceedings afresh, challenging the summoning order in view of order dated 15.09.2023 passe....
TaxTMI