Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1980 (10) TMI 50

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to the deduction of the share in the fixed deposit under section 5(1)(xxvi) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, for the assessment year 1973-74 ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to any exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealthtax Act for the assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75 and 1975-76 ? " The assessment year with which we are concerned is the year 1973-74. The assessee is a minor and she was assessed to wealth-tax through her father as guardian. The minor, assessee, is a beneficiary in a private trust called " Seematti Trust ". She is interested to the extent of 18% in the income and assets of the said trust. The Seematt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment to wealth-tax under s. 21(2) the assessee would be entitled to claim the full extent of exemption allowed by cl. (xxvi) of subs. (1) of s. 5. Accordingly, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee and held that the assessee was entitled to the deduction of her share in the fixed deposits by virtue of the exemption conferred by s. 5(1)(xxvi) of the Act. This reference has been made by the Tribunal at the instance of the revenue. Counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue strenuously argued that sub-s. (3) of s. 5 of the Act, as it stood at the relevant time, made it clear that the assessee would not be entitled to the benefit of exemption under cl. (xxvi) of sub-s. (1) of the said section unless the asset in question was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....egislature as meaning certificates which are registered in the name of the assessee and which stand in his name and not the certificates of which beneficial ownership is vested in him but which stand in the name or names of his nominee or nominees. We consider that the scope of the aforesaid observations has to be restricted to cases where the claim for exemption is put forward in respect of assets allegedly held benami in the names of others. Counsel for the revenue, however, urged that this decision is an authority laying down that an asset in the nature of a bank deposit cannot be regarded as one " held by the assessee " unless the deposit receipt stands in the name of the assessee. It is true that there are some observations in the judg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nership of such assets. The aforesaid provisions make it clear beyond doubt that the assessment against the trustee in respect of assets held by him on behalf of the beneficiary is to be made on the basis of a statutory fiction that the assets concerned are held by the beneficiary in his direct ownership. The same fiction has to be applied while making an assessment directly against the beneficiary under sub-s. (2) of the section. Hence, when an assessment is made under s. 21 of the Act either against the trustee or directly against the beneficiary in respect of assets which form the subject-matter of a trust, the asset in question, to the extent to which the beneficiary has a beneficial interest therein, is to be deemed to be " held " by t....