Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (4) TMI 37

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : Mr.N.Ramesh Special Public Prosecutor (ED) ORDER M.S.RAMESH, J. The petitioner seeks for quashing of the ECIR proceedings against him, which is recorded in ECIR No.CEZO-I/35/2020 dated 22.06.2020. 2. The main ground raised by the petitioner is that the ECIR proceedings stems out of an FIR, which was registered in Crime No.7 of 2011, which culminated into a final....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....No.7273 of 2023. The allegation in the said case is that A1 to A7 have entered into a criminal conspiracy in the commission of offence relating to allotment of housing plots under Government Discretionary Quota; that A1 and A2 were allotted lands under the said quota; that A2, even before the sale deed was executed in her favour, had handed over the possession of the plot to the petitioner herein ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... request was declined by the Housing Board through letter dated 21.03.2011. It is also seen from records that the petitioner had paid a total sum of Rs. 1,12,96,560/- which included the cost of the plot and development charges. It must also be borne in mind that the allotment of plots in favour of the petitioner was alleged to have been done due to the undue influence exerted by A4 and the proceed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oudhary and Others v. Union of India and Others, reported in (2022) SCC Online SC 929, wherein, it is ruled as follows: "467. ... (v)(d) The offence under Section 3 of the 2002 Act is dependent on illegal gain of property as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence. It is concerning the process or activity connected with such property, which constitutes the offence of....