Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (3) TMI 1273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: C.S.C. ORDER 1. Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed praying for the following relief: "(i) Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned demand of penalty order passed in from GST MOV-09 date....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Green India Vs. State of U.P. and another), (Neutral Citation No.-2024:AHC:29885-DB), decided on 21.2.2024. 5. At present, the petitioners are opposed to quantum of penalty and not at the stage of detention of goods. 6. We find the stand taken by the revenue authority is harsh and unreasonable. 7. Since, the goods were inspected in transit, some time may have lost to the petitioners in ....