Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1978 (11) TMI 12

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s a settlement between the assessee (the petitioner) and the department for the two relevant assessment years, viz., assessment years 1958-59 and 1959-60, the corresponding accounting years for these two year s are the years ending 31st March, 1958, and 31st March, 1959, respectively. These assessments were completed on 31st January, 1961, on a total income of Rs. 4,12,987 and Rs. 4,69,809, respectively. Thereafter, on 6th January, 1964, the petitioner made an application for rectification of their assessment for the two years, contending, inter alia, that the addition of Rs. 1,25,294 and Rs. 11,729 for the two assessment years was not justified for the reasons indicated in the letter and that the assessments were required to be rectified a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssments had been accepted under s. 23(1) of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922. Further correspondence was carried on with the Commissioner in which he was invited to reconsider his decision But this request was not acceded to. The petitioner also addressed a letter to the CBDT and the Board also declined to interfere in the matter. The petitioner then also addressed a letter to the Finance Minister, but the Government refused to intervene. Mr. Vyas, on behalf of the petitioner, has submitted that irrespective of the merits of the application for rectification the ITO was required to pass an order thereon, which would be an order on the merits of the same, and it was not proper for the Commissioner to usurp the functions of the ITO. According to ....