Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Penalty Notices Invalidated for Lack of Clarity on Misreporting vs. Underreporting; ITAT Deletes Penalties.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Penalty u/s 270A and 271AAB - Defective notice u/s 274 - under reporting of income - search and seizure operation - The Tribunal found that the penalty notices under sections 270A and 271AAB were not in compliance with the legal requirements, as they failed to specify the exact limb under which the penalties were being levied (misreporting or underreporting of income). This lack of specificity was deemed to render the notices vague and legally insufficient to form the basis for penalty proceedings. - The Tribunal underscored that penalty proceedings are independent of assessment proceedings and must stand on their own merits. - The ITAT allowed the appeals filed by the firm, deleting the penalties....