Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (3) TMI 97

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 255/09-10/ACIT, Cir-3(1)/Vsp/12-13 and 256/09-10/Addl. CIT, R-3/VSP/12-13, dated 28/09/2012arising out of the order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] for the AY 2005-06 and u/s. 143(3) of the Act for the AY 2007-08. Since the assessee has raised identical grounds of appeal involving the similar issues and therefore, both these appeals are clubbed, heard together and disposed off in this consolidated order. Firstly, we shall take up ITA No.431/Viz/2012 (AY: 2005-06) as a lead appeal: 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee-company carrying the business of production and sale of censors, instruments and other related products which are used in Steel Industry, filed its return of income on 01/11/20....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....additional tax liability and interest thereon. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of the Ld. AO which was challenged by appellant on the ground that intimation of reassessment proceedings u/s. 147 is not permissible merely on the basis of change of opinion because the AO for subsequent AY 2006 -07 had taken a view that weighted deduction u/s. 35(2AB) cannot be allowed. 3. Even assuming (without admitting) that appellant was not eligible for weighted deduction u/s. 35(2AB) in respect of R&D expenditure towards field trials incurred at Rourkela (on the ground that the same was not covered under the definition of approved in-house R & D house and this is presently the subject matter of litigation before the Hon'b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stating that these expenses were incurred at Kalunga, Rourkela wherein such address was not mentioned in the Form-3CM and Form-3CL. The Ld. AR pleaded that the assessee may be allowed the normal deduction which was not disputed by the Ld. Revenue Authorities. Per contra, the Ld. DR fully supported the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities and pleaded to uphold the same. 5. We have heard both the sides and perused the material available on record as well as the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities. Admittedly, there is no dispute on the fact that the assessee has incurred expenditure on research activities which was approved by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India. The relevant Form-3CM and Form-3CL are reproduc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....A), Visakhapatnam erred in confirming the order of the Ld. AO in disallowing entire weighted deduction to the extent of Rs. 1,05,85,292/- claimed u/s. 35(2AB) of the Act on the ground that appellant was not carrying on research activity at the address [9-30-4, Balaji Nagar, Siripuram, Visakhapatnam-530003] mentioned in Form 3CL / 3CM issued by the Department of Science & Industrial Research (DSIR), Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, but incurred part of the expenditure at Kalunga, Rourkela. Such disallowance has resulted in additional tax liability and interest thereon. 2. Even assuming (without admitting) that appellant was not eligible for weighted deduction u/s. 35(2AB) in respect of R&D expenditure towards....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he AY 2007-08 also. Accordingly, these grounds raised by the assessee are allowed. 12. Ground No.3 is general in nature and need no adjudication. 13. Since Grounds No. 1 & 2 raised by the assessee are adjudicated in favour of the assessee, the additional ground raised by the assessee needs no adjudication. 14. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed. 15. Ex-consequenti, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed. Pronounced in the open Court on 28^th February, 2024. ============= Document 1 T foam aire vrait cras JOVAN AUNISTRY SCIENCE & TECTINGLORY Department of Science & int Ta hacin FORM NO. 3 CM Bat. Address und FAN of the company: Trip Artive. -30-y PAN NO: AAD CA....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s Ms Albee Business Services Pl 0-30-4, Balaji Nagar, Siripuram Visakhapatnam - 530003 (AP) Tel. No. 0891-2702852-53 Fax. No. 0891-2756507 Permanent Account Number (PAN) or the company. AADCA4A None and designation of the Principal Oficar of the cagay Dr. G.V. Ramana, Director. Nature of Business/activity of the company Manufacture production of electronic quality control equipment and " consumables. Annual production of the eligible products of the concany de past three yours. Year 2002-03 2003-04 200-1-05 Rs in lotna Woduction 1002.44! 730.14 Proposed objectives of scientific research contemplated by the company. To indigenise imported components and control ....