2013 (4) TMI 1001

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r M/S Gagrat & Co., Advs.  Mr.Amit Gupta, Adv.  Mr.Sarwa Mitter, Adv.  Mr.Sabin Rana, Adv.  Ms.Anupama Dhurve, Adv.  For M/S Mitter & Mitter Co., Advs. In SLP(C)No.37455/12 Mr.S.K.Bagaria, Sr.Adv.  Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Adv.  Mr.Bibek Mohanti, Adv.  M.Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv.  Mr.Madhur Jain, Adv.  Mr.Mark Wright, Adv. In SLP(C)No.13761/13 Mr.Harish N.Salve, Sr.Adv.  Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Adv.  Mr.Jagmohan Sharma, Adv.  Mr.Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv.  Mr.Madhur Jain, Adv. In SLP(C)No.449/13 Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Adv.  Mr.Bibek Mohanti, Adv.  Mr.Mark Wright, Adv. In SLP(C)No.40147/2012 Mr.Sunil K.Jain, Adv.  Mr.Bibek Mohanti, Adv.  Mr.Mark Wrig....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SLP(C)No.36187/2012: (Tata Steel Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa & Ors.) Shri Harish Salve, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that he is not seeking any interim order towards the past transaction(s) and for the past demand(s). He would further submit that this Court may grant him interim order towards the future demands that may be raised by the respondent- authorities. Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents also accedes to the request made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Keeping in view the above, so far as the past transactions are concerned, we are not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioners. Insofar as the future tra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the demand. If, for any reason, the petitioner in each case fails to comply with the orders and directions passed by this Court, the respondents would be at liberty to recover the entire tax liability with interest. We make it clear that, if for any reason, the petitioner(s) succeed in these matters, the respondent-authorities shall refund the amounts paid by the petitioner(s) pursuant to the interim orders passed by us within 30 days' time from the date of the order with statutory interest. Ordered accordingly. SLP(C)Nos.37708-37709/2012: (M/s. GMR Kamalanga Ltd. Vs. State of Odisha & Ors.) In these petitions, the petitioner is primarily questioning the two demand notices issued by the respondents towards payment of en....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ould further submit that this Court may grant interim order for the future demands that may be raised by the respondent- authorities. Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents also accedes to the request made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Keeping in view the above, insofar as the past transactions are concerned, we are not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioners. In the case of future transactions and the demands that may be raised by the respondents, the petitioner shall pay 50% of the aforesaid demands within a month's time from the date of the demands. If, for any reason, the petitioner fails to comply with the orders and directions passed by this Court, the respondents....