Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (2) TMI 449

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r Advocate with Ms. Ranjana Roy, Mr. Vasudha Sen, Mr. Perminder Singh Jassal, Mr. Vineet Wadhwa, Ms. K. Hema and Ms. Ananya Narain, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Ms. Ria Khanna, Advocates for respondent No. 2. Mr. Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vipin Jain, Ms. Reena Khair, Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Ms. Shyam Goyal Ms. Turina ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on to the said course being adopted by the Designated Authority in terms of this order. 3. Reference may be had to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Reliance Industries Ltd. vs. Designated Authority and Others, 2006 (202) ELT 23 (SC), wherein the Supreme Court has held as under:- "27. The provisions relating to injury analysis in Annexure II to the Antidumping Rules are also clear that the i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... will lead to a situation where an artificial discrimination will be created between the integrated and non-integrated companies to the peril of the smaller plants with no backward integration(backward integration means a factory which also produces its own raw materials etc). In such situations, the result will be that the companies with no backward integration will suffer adversely. In our opini....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Insofar as the issue of dumping and price undercutting is concerned, a positive finding was returned by the Adjudicating Authority in its final finding dated 27.10.2022, which were not in issue before the Appellate Tribunal. 7. Respondent No. 3, Domestic Industry had impugned the order before Appellate Tribunal primarily on the ground that the Adjudicating Authority had returned a finding that du....