Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (1) TMI 244

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....<br>Central Excise<br>HON&#39;BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL), MR. RAMESH NAIR And HON&#39;BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL), MR. RAJU None (On merit) appeared for the Appellant Shri Sanjay Kumar, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent ORDER RAMESH NAIR The issue involved in the present case is that whether the Brand "Roopkala" owned by family and used by the appellant being one of the family member can....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ding of the impugned order. 4. On careful consideration of submission made by Learned AR and the perusal of record, we find that the fact is not under dispute that the brand 'Roopkala' belongs to a family and the same is used by different members of the same family. It is also found that either side have no objection in use of 'Roopkala' brand. It is also the submission of the appellant that th....