Customs Act Case: Statements Not Sole Evidence; Multiple Direct Proofs Justify Duty Liability, Petition Dismissed.

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws →

Customs Act Case: Statements Not Sole Evidence; Multiple Direct Proofs Justify Duty Liability, Petition Dismissed.

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....Relevancy of statements u/s 138B of Customs Act - Section 138B per se does not provide for any cross examination, as the provision deals with relevancy of statements in the facts and circumstances of the case. - On a perusal of the impugned order-in-original which runs into 118 pages and on a holistic reading of the order, it cannot be said that the order is passed only on the statements of three witnesses of which cross-examination has not been granted, but there were various other direct evidences against the petitioner, for the duty liability to be fastened on the petitioner. - Petition dismissed - HC....

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Customs Act Case: Statements Not Sole Evidence; Multiple Direct Proofs Justify Duty Liability, Petition Dismissed.