Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (11) TMI 506

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondents-Revenue : Mr. N.C. Mohanty. P.C. : 1. Petitioner is impugning an order dated 30th December 2016 passed under Section 144 read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. It is petitioner's case that there were two directors in the Board of petitioner namely Devesh Ajmera and Uma Devesh Ajmera, it was Devesh Ajmera the husband of Uma Ajmera wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h February 2020. 3. We have considered the impugned order dated 30th December 2016 in which it is stated, and rightly so, that the notices that were sent to petitioner came back undelivered with the endorsement "Left". The A.O., it appears from the impugned order, was racing against time because the matter would have got time barred and therefore passed the impugned order. Paragraph No. 5 of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... about the existence of the order only on or about March 2020, the time to file appeal has also expired. 6. It is averred in the petition that the OTS with Union Bank of India was only about Rs. 42 Lakhs and not Rs. 9.60 Crores. Therefore, in our view grave prejudice will be caused to petitioner if the impugned order is sustained. 7. Dr. Shivaram also states that petitioner/Uma Devesh Ajmera wil....