2009 (4) TMI 126

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Ray and Antaryami Upadhyay, Advocates, for the Petitioner. Ms. Monika Garg, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order].- Rule D.B. : By this application, the Petitioner seeks a direction to the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to export chrome concentrate under the Sale Contracts dated 21st February, 2009 and 23rd February, 2009 in terms of the order dated 1st October, 2008 earlier passed b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re Beneficiation plants and exported by 100% export oriented units. 6. The Central Government found that there was no linkage mechanism to verify the quality of Cr2O3 being beneficiated. Accordingly, it is stated in the counter affidavit filed by the Respondents that the exports of chrome concentrate/chrome ore had earlier been on the increase. It is further stated in the counter affidavit that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on that have been accepted by the Courts in the country, the Petitioner is entitled to make the exports in terms of the contracts that it has already entered into. 9. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has drawn our attention to the interim order dated 1st October, 2008 passed by a Division Bench of this Court wherein the, Petitioner was permitted to partly perform its contracts entered into on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion, having been entered into after the policy of canalization was put in place by the Government, cannot be given effect to until and unless the writ petition is decided in favour of the Petitioner. 12. Our attention has been drawn to decisions of the Supreme Court, particularly P.T.R. Exports (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. and others v. Union of India and others, 1996 (86) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) = (1996) 5 SCC ....