2023 (10) TMI 1148
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e C. Saravanan For the Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramamurthy for Mr.N.Murali For the Respondents : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate ORDER Mrs. K. Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 19.04.2023 passed by the first respondent. By the impugned order, the first respondent has dismisse....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....delay of 7 month and 11 days. In view of the above reasons, the appeal petition filed by you could not be entertained and therefore, returned." 3. The appeal was filed by the petitioner with a delay of 7 months and 11 days i.e., on 12.04.2023. The impugned order passed by the first respondent dismissing the appeal of the petitioner cannot be faulted. As an officer acting under the provisions of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dated 23.01.2023 from the third respondent (Assistant Commissioner (ST) Thirumullaivoyal), titled as an order for dropping the proceedings under Section 73/74, which stated that for the period from April 2018 to March 2019, since DRC-07 summary of order had already been issued dated 02.04.2022 (a copy of which was enclosed), the proceedings before the second respondent were dropped (Velacherry Ass....
TaxTMI