Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition due to delay.Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv)/11/12 - whether activities of the respondent/assessee do not qualify for charitable purpose in view of the Proviso to Sec 2(15)? - as decided by HC [ 2022 (1) TMI 544 - DELHI HIGH COURT] mandamus is issued to the respondent to grant approval to the petitioner u/s 10(23C)(iv) -- HELD THAT:- Special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of delay.... ... ... Title: Supreme Court dismisses special leave petition for delay

Judges: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT And HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

Petitioner's Counsel: Mr. Balbir Singh, A.S.G. and others

Respondent's Counsel: Mr. Mayank Nagi and others

Decision: Special leave petition dismissed due to delay Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv)/11/12 - whether activities of the respondent/assessee do not qualify for charitable purpose in view of the Proviso to Sec 2(15)? - as decided by HC [ 2022 (1) TMI 544 - DELHI HIGH COURT] mandamus is issued to the respondent to grant approval to the petitioner u/s 10(23C)(iv) -- HELD THAT:- Special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of delay. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) Versus INDIAN TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION
Income Tax
2023 (10) TMI 851 - SC Order - TMI
SUPREME COURT - SC
Dated:- 16-10-2023
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO(S). 24647/2023 - -
Income Tax
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT And HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Balbir Singh, A.S.G. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. Shashank Bajpai, Adv. Mr. Naman Tondon, Adv. Mr. Rupender Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Sarthak Karol, Adv. Mr. Sushil Raaja, Adv For the Respondent : Mr. Mayank Nagi, Adv. Ms. Mahua Kalra, AOR ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following The special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of delay.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders