Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (10) TMI 202

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....JDR, for the Respondent. [Order].- The appellants herein, steamer agents, filed IGM dated 29-7-2002 tor vessel "M.V. Gudrun Maersk". In the manifest, they failed to include goods covered by bill of lading No. POCLWCZ/225575786 dated 28-6-2002 in respect of one container. However, the goods covered in this bill of lading were unloaded from the ship. The Commissioner of Customs ordered confiscati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....case of P&O Nedlloyed (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. CC, Mumbai - 2004 (166) E.L.T. 489 and Arebeen Star Maritime Agencies Pvt. Ltd. v. CC, Raigad - 2006 (201) E.L.T. 106. However, in the case of CC(I), New Cus. House, Mumbai v. Patvolk - 2006 (202) E.L.T. 411 (Bom.), the Hon'ble Bombay High Court has held that non-disclosure of entire goods in import manifest results in liability of such goods to confiscat....