Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 672

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....allenged the disallowance made of Rs. 2,53,29,652 under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. 4. Briefly, the facts are, the assessee, a resident corporate entity, filed its return of income for the assessment year under dispute on 30.11.2019 declaring income of Rs. 759,53,94,050. The return of income so filed by the assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act by the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC), Bangaluru and an intimation dated 31.03.2021 was issued to the assessee wherein the total income was determined at Rs. 754,11,59,870. The variation in the total income was due to the following two adjustments: i) Increase in disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) of the Act ; & Rs. 17,905 ii) Increase in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ade before the first appellate authority, however, the appeal proceeding having been conducted under the faceless scheme, the first appellate authority did not at all consider the submissions made by the assessee. Thus, he submitted, the issue can be restored back to the first appellate authority. 7. Learned Departmental Representative did not oppose assessee's request for restoration of the issue to the first appellate authority. 8. We have considered rival submissions and perused the material available on record. 9. It is the specific contention of learned counsel for the assessee before us that before making the adjustment and issuing intimation under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act, the CPC has not complied with the condition of f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....elating to TDS amount of Rs. 4,31,143, credit for which it has been claimed by the assessee, has been offered to tax or not and thereafter allow the credit. In any case of the matter, the restriction imposed under Section 251 of the Act is only in respect of the first appellate authority. Therefore, we direct the Assessing Officer to verify whether the assessee has offered the corresponding income in relation to which it has claimed credit for TDS amount to Rs. 4,31,143 and thereafter allow the credit. Needless to mention, assessee must be given an opportunity of being heard on the issue. 13. In ground no.5, the assessee has raised the issue of non-grant of TDS amounting to Rs. 5,76,79,710. It is the contention of learned counsel for the....