2023 (8) TMI 618

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ved Person', in respect of the 'Impugned Order', dated 12/05/2023 in IA/361/IB/2020 in C.P.(IB)/540(CHE)/2017, (being the correct number of main Company Petition, before the 'Adjudicating Authority' and not CP/889/(CHE)/2019, mentioned in the 'Order' assailed before this 'Tribunal') passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority' / 'National Company Law Tribunal, Division Bench - II, Chennai'. Earlier, the 'Adjudicating Authority' / 'National Company Law Tribunal, Division Bench - II, Chennai', while passing the Impugned Order in IA/361/IB/2020 in C.P.(IB)/540(CHE)/2017, dated 12/05/2023 (filed by the 'Appellant'/ 'Petitioner' under Section 60(5) of the I&B Code, 2016) at Paragraphs Nos. 11-13 had observed the following: "11. Given the f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Mas dated 03.07.2019 filed before this Tribunal, the applicant had admitted its position as Unsecured Financial Creditor." and ultimately, had not entertained the said 'Application' and 'dismissed' the same, but 'without Costs'. Prelude : At the outset, the Learned Counsel for the 'Appellant', fairly points out, before this 'Tribunal', that the 'Correct Number of Company Petition', is C.P.(IB)/540/(CHE)/2017, on the file of the 'Adjudicating Authority'/ 'National Company Law Tribunal, Division Bench - II, Chennai' and the C.P.(IB)/IB/889/(CHE)/2019, mentioned in the Impugned Order is not a Correct one for which the Learned Counsel for the Appellant had given a 'letter' to the 'Adjudicating Authority'/ 'Tribunal', dated 06/06/2023....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rocess' (CIRP), the 'Appellant'/ 'Financial Creditor' was categorised as an 'Unsecured Financial Creditor', although a combined reading of the definitions in Section 3(27) (30) & (31), read with Sections 5(7) and 5(8) of the 'I&B Code, 2016', the 'Appellant'/ 'Petitioner' is demonstrably and undoubtedly a 'Secured Financial Creditor' It is brought to the fore on behalf of the 'Respondent' by the Learned Counsel for the 'Respondent', Mr. Pradeep Joy that in the instant case, the 'Committee of Creditors' had approved the 'Resolution Plan' on 11/06/2019, and that the 'Adjudicating Authority' / 'Tribunal' had approved the Resolution Plan on 27/06/2019 and that the Resolution Plan got implemented on 31/03/2020 and by virtue of the Plan being ....