TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (8) TMI 601
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... disposal. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant are engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods falling under Chapter Heading 8544 of CETA, 1985. The appellant imported the inputs viz. 7/8 Radio Frequency (RF) Cables on payment of appropriate applicable customs duties on the same. The said inputs are processed and converted into two types viz. Jumper Cables and RF Feeder Cables. They have availed and utilised cenvat credit on various duties paid at the time of import, which were later utilised in the clearance of the finished goods, after carrying out the process like connectorising, testing, repacking and relabelling on the said feeder cables in their factory. On the basis of statements of two transporters, i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eturns viz. ER-1 with jurisdictional Central Excise authorities showing the clearances on payment of duty. Consequent to the audit of their records between February 2007 to May 2007, it was opined that the cables imported by the appellant on which they availed credit was not an input as no activity of manufacturing carried out on the said imported items. Later, statements of the General Manager was taken and also of two transporters viz. M/s. Vishnu Roadways & Logistics Services and M/s. Dhawan Roadways Services. The allegation of the Department was that the inputs were not received inside the factory and secondly, assuming that the inputs in question were brought into the factory, but the processes undertaken on the said inputs did not res....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....laries and wages paid to workers and employees, claimed depreciation on plant & machinery. All these evidences though produced before the authorities below, the same were not considered and discarded. He has submitted that once the Department has accepted the duty on the final products considering the fact that the inputs processed resulted into dutiable product later, the Department cannot be allowed to deny cenvat credit on the inputs alleging the processes carried out not amount to manufacture. In support, he has referred to the judgment of this Tribunal and High Courts, particularly the judgment of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CCE Vs. Vishal Precision Steel Tubes & Strips Pvt. Ltd. [2017(349) ELT 686 (Kar.)], which follow....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....consumption, factory overheads etc., which indicate that processes on the inputs were undertaken in their factory premises after the inputs brought into their factory. Also, the statements of two transporters relied upon by the learned Commissioner do not inspire confidence inasmuch as further investigation was not carried out by the Department and the transporters have not categorically claimed to have not transported the goods during the period they have employed by the appellant. Besides, the statements of two transporters among 13 to 14 transporters cannot be generalised and made applicable to the entire period. In these circumstances, the alternative argument pursued by the Department in denying the credit that the processes do not res....