Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (8) TMI 278

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Kumaresh, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)].- After examining the records, we find that the Commissioner (revisional authority) demanded service tax of Rs. 5,66,650/- from the appellants for the period prior to 16-8-2002 under the proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 and also imposed on them a penalty of Rs. 40 lakhs under Section 78 of that Act. The ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ispute that this activity for the period from 1-1-2005 is classifiable as 'Manpower Recruitment Supply Service' under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, for the prior period, the department is seeking to collect service tax from the appellants in respect of the same activity, under the head 'Management Consultancy Service'. On these facts, we have found prima facie case for the appellan....