2009 (4) TMI 82

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Mr. Vijay Kumar, SDR for the Respondent. [Order per M. Veeraiyan, Member (Technical) (for the Bench)]. - Heard both sides on the stay petition. 2. The dispute relates to payments made month-wise during the half-year from April, 2005 to September, 2005. It is seen that for the same month April, 2005, the applicant was required to pay tax of Rs.1,90,25,381/- whereas they....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... advised by the Department to make the excess deposits as part of revenue drive which was reflected in the statement for the month of April, 2005. The assessment in their case was provisional. Though they were required to pay service tax relating to any month either in the same month (i.e. for March) or by 5th of the next month, they were filing the return half-yearly and they have adjusted excess....