Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (1) TMI 122

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ransferred technical know-how and provided technical assistance to LGB for manufacture of automotive chains and associated equipment such as tools. LGB paid royalty @ 5% / 8% of sale price of chains for local sale/export as well as separate technical know how fees as mutually agreed. The lower authorities found that BEGELB had rendered consulting engineer's service as the agreement had envisaged provision of, inter alia, the following: (1) review and supervision of both design and construction. (2) assistance rendered in establishing cost effective manufacturing of automotive silent chain. (3) providing consultancy on upgradation of technology in use by LGB (4) providing technical and commercial advice on marketing. (5) p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....obtain any document authenticated by the Indian Embassy, in the USA, certifying the status of the appellant as a proprietorship concern or a firm, as directed by this Tribunal. She submits a copy of the website of BEGELB which describes the appellant as a private company. She submits that the possible conclusion was that BEGELB had been a proprietorship concern. As regards the merits of the case, she relies on the following case law. 1. Motherson Automotive Tech & Engg. v. CCE, Chennai-III - 2008 (12) S.T.R. 377 (Tri.-Chen.) 2. Same Engines India (P) Ltd., v. CCE, Chennai - 2006 (3) S.T.R. 601 (T) = 2005 (186) E.L.T. 247 (Tri.-Chen.) It is submitted that the main grounds taken in the appeal are that the service rendered as per the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ide concept and design layouts for the production of automotive silent chain. 5. It will provide technical consultation on upgradation of technology. 6. It will provide technical and commercial advise and counsel on how to market the products. 7. It will visit offices and factories of LGB on quarterly basis for this purpose. 8. It will provide technical know-how for a fee of US$ 9,85,000. 9. LGB has to pay 8% & 5% respectively of the sale price of the chains for export and domestic sale as royalty for 7 years to BEGELB under this technology transfer agreement. I find that the agreement envisages provision of technical know how to manufacture automotive chains and ancillary equipment for the purpose. In order to effectuate ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ified engineer or, a firm of such engineers, in the feasibility, basic design, detailed design, construction, commissioning and running of a project which also includes training of manpower, trouble shooting, and establishing system etc. A transaction in intellectual property along with the right to manufacture the licensed product is totally different from the technical assistance rendered by an engineer or a firm of engineers. When intellectual property services was brought under the tax net without altering the scope of "Consulting Engineer service", the new impost covers an activity hitherto not exigible to service tax under the head "Consulting Engineer". The impugned services are appropriately classifiable under intellectual property ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ured with the know how in terms of the agreement. In addition to royalty, LGB paid technical know how fees quarterly since July, 1997. This was found to be consideration for engineering consultancy received by LGB. The Tribunal had held in Diebold Systems (P) Ltd. v. CST, Chennai reported in 2008 (9) S.T.R. 546 (Tri.-Chen.), as follows: "Introduction of a new entry for the purpose of levy of tax presupposes that it was not covered by any of the pre-existing entries. In other words, in the ever-widening sphere of service tax, addition of an item to the list of taxable services is just an addition, and not a subtraction from a pre-existing entry. This reality was noted by this Tribunal in the case of Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals (supra....