TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (7) TMI 167
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g material during the course of search. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is a Real Estate Developer and is a well-known name in Infrastructure and Real Estate Projects in North- East. A search under section 132 of the Income Tax Act was carried out upon the group including the premises of the assessee on 17.09.2015. A notice under section 153A was issued on 12.06.2017. In response to this notice, assessee filed its return of income on 28.11.2017 declaring total income at Rs. 19,82,260/-. The ld. Assessing Officer thereafter issued notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The ld. Assessing Officer has observed that during the financial year 2012-13, assessee-company has taken unsecured loan from Kolkata based three companies as under:- Sl. No. Name of Company Amount of unsecured loans 1. M/s. KLS Commodities Pvt. Limited Rs.1,65,00,000/- 2. M/s. Shree Ramkrupa Finance Pvt. Limited Rs. 95,00,000/- 3. M/s. Burlington Barter Pvt. Limited Rs. 40,00,000/- The ld. Assessing Officer thereafter observed that these companies are shell companies, who were engaged in providing accommodation entries and, therefore....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y exercised the power under section 153A and enquired the genuineness of these loans in the assessment proceedings under section 153A of the Income Tax Act. 7. We have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. Before adverting to the facts and alleged seized material considered by the ld. Assessing Officer for making the addition in the hands of the present assessees, we deem it appropriate to bear in mind the position of law propounded in various authoritative judgments expounding scope of section 153A of the Act. We are of the view that in this regard, there were large numbers of decisions. First we refer to the decision of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v-vs.- Kabul Chawla, 380 ITR 573 (Del.). Hon'ble Delhi High Court after detailed analysis has summarized the following legal position: 37. On a conspectus of Section 153A(1) of the Act, read with the provisos thereto, and in the light of the law explained in the aforementioned decisions, the legal position that emerges is as under: (i) Once a search takes place under Section 132 of the Act, notice under Section 153 A(l) will have to be mandatorily issued to the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t has also considered the decision of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kabul Chawla (supra). Hon'ble Gujarat High Court framed the following question of law in the case of Pr.CIT Vs. Saumya Construction (supra): "(a) Whether the order of Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the addition made in assessment made u/s 153A of the Act? (b) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the addition should be based on the incriminating material found during the course of search under new procedure of assessment u/s 153A which is different from earlier procedure u/s 158BC r.w.s. 158BB of the Act and by reading into the section, the words 'the incriminating material found during the course of search' which are not there in section 153A? (c) Whether the Tribunal erred in relying on the ITAT order in Sanjay Aggarwal v. DCIT (2014) 47 Taxmann.Com 210 (Del) which has interpreted undisclosed income unearthed during the search to imply incriminating material, as against the finding of the Delhi High Court in Filatex India Ltd. v. CIT IV (2015) 229 Taxman 555 wherein it is held that during the assessment u/s 153A additio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r section 147 of the Act as well as under section 153A of the Act. 17. In the facts of the present case, a search came to be conducted on 07.10.2009 and the notice was issued to the assessee under section 153A of the Act for assessment year 2006-07 on 04.08.2010. In response to the notice, the assessee filed return of income on 18.11.2010. In terms of section 153B, the assessment was required to be completed within a period of two years from the end of the financial year in which the search came to be carried out, namely, on or before 31st March, 2012. Here, insofar as the impugned addition is concerned, the notice in respect thereof came to be issued on 19.12.2011 seeking an explanation from the assessee. The assessee gave its response by reply dated 21.12.2011 calling upon the Assessing Officer to provide copies of statements recorded on oath of Shri Rohit P. Modi and Smt. Pareshaben K. Modi during the search as well as the copies of the documents upon which the department placed reliance for the purpose of making the proposed addition as well as the copy of the explanation given by Shri Rohit P. Modi and Smt. Pareshaben K. Modi regarding the on-money received, copies of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rs is a separate and distinct assessment. Under section 153A of the Act, an assessment has to be made in relation to the search or requisition, namely, in relation to material disclosed during the search or requisition. If in relation to any assessment year, no incriminating material is found, no addition or disallowance can be made in relation to that assessment year in exercise of powers under section 153A of the Act and the earlier assessment shall have to be reiterated. In this regard, this court is in complete agreement with the view adopted by the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Jai Steel (India), Jodhpur (supra). Besides, as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent, the controversy involved in the present case stands concluded by the decision of this court in the case of Jayaben Ratilal Sorathia (supra) wherein it has been held that while it cannot be disputed that considering section 153A of the Act, the Assessing Officer can reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment yea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ub-section (2) of Section 153A, if any proceeding initiated or any order of assessment or reassessment made under sub-section (1) has been annulled in appeal or any other legal proceeding, then, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) or section 153, the assessment or reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to subsection (1), shall stand revived with effect from the date of receipt of the order of such annulment by the Commissioner. Therefore, the intention of the legislation seems to be that in case of search only the pending assessment/reassessment proceedings shall abate and the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assess or reassess the 'total income' for the entire six years period/block assessment period. The intention does not seem to be to re-open the completed/unabated assessments, unless any incriminating material is found with respect to concerned assessment year falling within last six years preceding the search. Therefore, on true interpretation of Section 153A of the Act, 1961, in case of a search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A and during the search any incriminating material is found, ev....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion 153A and subsection (2) of Section 153A would be redundant and/or rewriting the said provisions, which is not permissible under the law. For the reasons stated here in above, we are in complete agreement with the view taken by the Delhi High Court in the case of Kabul Chawla (supra) and the Gujarat High Court in the case of Saumya Construction (supra) and the decisions of the other High Courts taking the view that no addition can be made in respect of the completed assessments in absence of any incriminating material. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, it is concluded as under: (i) that in case of search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes the jurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; (ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall stand abated; (iii) In case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of unabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the incriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material available with the AO including the i....