2020 (1) TMI 1646

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 634 days in filing the application seeking leave to appeal. 2. It is mentioned in the application that the complaint filed by the applicant-complainant was dismissed on 09.08.2012 and thereafter, the applicant had filed an appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, Jhajjar, well within the period of limitation, but the said appeal had been di....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dated 11.07.2008, amounting to Rs. 5,00,000/- each. 6. The learned trial Magistrate has recorded the following reasons to dismiss the complaint: (i) It is claimed by the complainant that the accused had entered into an agreement to sell dated 15.04.2008 (Ex. P-1) by which he had assured the complainant for the purpose of a plot and complainant had also handed over Rs. 25,00,000/- to hi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n dispute had been issued by the accused to the complainant in discharge of a legally enforceable debt. 7. The learned Magistrate has taken a reasonable and probable view on appreciation of evidence. 8. As per the conclusion drawn by the learned Magistrate, the complainant could not prove on record that the cheques in dispute had been issued by the accused to him in discharge of a legally en....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ils enigmatic and stigmatic exposures and experiences and, thus, it becomes of paramount importance to demand evidence of unimpeachable character and of unambiguous nature. 10. Therefore, considering the above mentioned facts and legal positions, it would not be unjustified and completely misplaced to say that the complainant has miserably failed to prove if the impugned cheques had been issued....