2009 (4) TMI 22
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... MEHTA - This petition has been preferred challenging the order of attachment dated 9/3/2009 for failure on part of the petitioner to make payment of Rs.24,29,387/- through the P.L. Account of the petitioner. Upon issuance of notice, respondent authorities have put in appearance and affidavit-in-reply dated 31/3/2009 has been tendered. Considering the scope of controversy between the parties....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f duty amount of Rs.23,95,653/- + education cess of Rs.33,734/- in cash / from P.L. Account. However, correspondence ensued between the parties and ultimately resulted in the impugned order of attachment dated 9/3/2009. In the affidavit-in-reply, in paragraph no.5 respondent authority has referred to communication dated 6/1/2009 addressed by the petitioner to the respondent authority. Said comm....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ave suggested to discuss the matter with Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Anand. Hence we have approached to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Anand on 05.01.2009 for the above subject matter and in the discussion the Assistant Commissioner the matter is related to 2006 and refund/re-credit period is one year due to it is time barred so they can not allow to re-credit in th....
TaxTMI