Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (3) TMI 65

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HTA - On 23/3/2000, at the time of admission, following question of law was formulated by this Court: "(B) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case based on reappraisal of evidence, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that an amount of Rs.2,36,85,075/- allowed as deduction u/s 43B to the amalgamating sister concern would not be liable to be included in the hand....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mmissioner (Appeals) had upheld the addition, holding that, as the said deduction was allowed in the hands of Vareli and the closing stock, after such deduction, had been taken over by the assessee company, the opening stock in the hands of the assessee company had to be enhanced by the said figure. Learned counsel, therefore, urged that the Tribunal was in error in deleting the addition in questi....