TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (6) TMI 1199
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Bankruptcy<br>[ Justice M. Venugopal ] Member ( Judicial ) And [ Shreesha Merla ] Member ( Technical ) For the Appellant : Mr.B. Thilak Narayanan , Advocate For the Respondents : No Appearance JUDGEMENT ( Virtual Mode ) [ Per : Shreesha Merla , Member ( Technical ) ] 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 06.12.2021, passed in IA/296/IB/2020 in IBA/898/2019, by the National Company Law Tribunal, Di....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....also seen that the Applicant had effected public announcement on 23.01.2020 and the Applicant admitted that he had received Rs.20,000/- towards publication expenses. 7. Further, it is seen that the Respondents have not appeared before this Tribunal. The Private notice dated 21.08.2020 caused by the Applicant was also returned as "no such person'. 8. In so far as the prayer (a) is concerned, se....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... particularly, the IRP, in the consideration of this Tribunal has not taken enough steps in order to conduct the CIRP proceedings in relation to the Corporate Debtor." 2. It is the case of the Appellant that the CIRP in respect of the Corporate Debtor was ordered by the 'Adjudicating Authority' on 20.01.2019 in IBA/898/2019 and pursuant to the order, the IRP had sent a letter to the Corporate Deb....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ired to constitute the CoC with the sole Operational Creditor. 5. To a query from the Bench, with respect to any 'Claims' received, it was submitted that not a single 'Claim' was received. It is contended that 'the Company' having been struck off for non-filing of the financial statements, the Adjudicating Authority ought to have allowed the Application seeking dismissal of the CIRP. 6. This Tri....