Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (6) TMI 1029

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e case, and in law, the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 2(2)(1), International Taxation, New Delhi [hereinafter referred as the "AO"] and the Dispute Resolution Panel -2 [hereinafter referred as the "DRP"] are bad in law and void ab-initio [herein referred to as 'assessment order' and 'DRP order']. 1.1 That, on facts, and in law, the AO has erred in not providing an adequate opportunity of being heard to the Appellant, thereby violating principals of natural justice, while passing the final assessment order under section 143(3)/144C of the Act for the AY 2017-18. 2. That, on the facts, and in the circumstances of the case, and in law, AO / DRP have erred in holding / upholding that the co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... software and then transmit the same onwards to the end customers. 7. That, on the facts, and in the circumstances of the case, and in law, the AO has erred in not applying an independent mind with respect to the year under consideration and merely reproduced the observations made by the erstwhile AO in the final assessment passed under section 143(3)/144 of the Act for AY 2015-16. 7.1 That, the observations made by the AO in the impugned assessment order are merely based on conjectures and surmises, rather than on facts and circumstances of the Appellant, i.e. inter alia as under: (a) The AO has erred in observing from the content/information, downloaded from the global website of the Appellant, that the source c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is India-lreland DTAA. As per Article 12 of the DTAA, royalties means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematograph films or films or tapes for radio or television broadcasting, any patent, trade mark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process or for the use of or the right to use industrial, commercial or scientific equipment, other than an aircraft, or for information concerning industrial commercial or scientific experience. According to the submissions made by the assessee, the payments received for sale of software, without allowing any right to use the copyright in the software, would not be covered w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of section 9(1)(vi) as the definition of 'royalty' under section 9(1)(vi) is broader than the definition of 'royalty' under the DTAA as the right that is transferred in the instant case is the transfer of copyright including the right to make copy of software for internal business, and payment made in that regard would constitute 'royalty' for imparting of any information concerning technical, industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge, experience or skill as per clause (iv) of Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi). In any view of the matter, in view of the provisions of section 90, agreements with foreign countries (DTAA) would override the provisions of the Act. Once it is held that payment made by the assessee to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tronics Company Limited 345 ITR 494 has been considered at para-10 and after considering other judgment of Hon'ble High Courts the Hon'ble Supreme Court concluded as under :- 167. Given the definition of royalties contained in Article 12 of the DTAAs mentioned in paragraph 41 of this judgment, it is clear that there is no obligation on the persons mentioned in section 195 of the Income Tax Act to deduct tax at source, as the distribution agreements/EULAs in the facts of these cases do not create any interest or right in such distributors/end-users, which would amount to the use of or right to use any copyright. The provisions contained in the Income Tax Act (section 9(l)(vi), along with explanations 2 and 4 thereof), which deal wit....