2008 (6) TMI 183

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R. L. Lamba for the Respondent. ORDER 1. The respondent is engaged in the business of Share Broker service. It has been alleged that there was a delay in filing of return and payment of tax for the period from April, 1999 to March, 2004. The respondents deposited the tax of Rs. 2,32,308 on different dates. A show-cause notice was issued proposing demand of interest of Rs. 35,448 and pen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....they deposited the tax after detection by the revenue. The mandatory penalty should be imposed. 3. The learned Advocate on behalf of the respondent, reiterates the findings of the Commissioner of Central Excise. He submits that the respondents deposited the tax before issue of show-cause notice. Therefore, no penalty is warranted. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, th....