2008 (10) TMI 119

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for non payment of service tax on the services provided by them during the period from March 2003 to September 2004, which culminated in confirmation of demand of service tax amounting to Rs. 39,692/-, equal amount of penalty under Section 76 of Finance Act, 1994 and equal amount of penalty under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994. In fact, original adjudicating authority, the Assistant Commissioner had imposed only nominal penalty on the appellant under various sections and Commissioner has passed an order in exercise of his power under Section 84 of Finance Act, 1994 and has enhanced the penalty as mentioned above. 2. Ld. Consultant on behalf of the appellant submits that penalty under Section 76 is not mandatory and is discretionary and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner has reproduced Section 76 and has discussed elaborately and as observed by him that appellants are liable to pay penalty under Section 76 in view of the delay of 3203 days. Further, Section 76 does not give any discretion and discretionary power can be exercised only under Section 80. But in this case appellants have failed to show that they are entitled to the benefits of Section 80. In view of the above, the penalty of Rs.39,692/- under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 is upheld. 3.2 In view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment with, regard to Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, which is similar to Section 78 under Finance Act, 1994, penalty under Section 78 is mandatory unless duty, interest and penalty to the extent of 25% h....