1995 (4) TMI 320

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hether the amended paragraph 26(2) of the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 (the scheme) framed under Section 5 of the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (the Act) was invalid and unconstitutional. The High Court answered the question in the negative. 2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties. The validity of paragraph 26(2) of the Scheme was challenged ....