2008 (9) TMI 182

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ind Baheti, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Manish Kumar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per: Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. 2. Under the impugned order, the appellants have been subjected to Service Tax in respect of the Consulting Engineers services received by them from outside India for the period from July, 2002 to December, 2004. 3. Shri J.P. Khaitan,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. v. Commr. of Central Excise, Jaipur - 2008 (11) S.T.R. 338 (Tri.-LB). Shri Khaitan argues that since one of the requirement was met w.e.f. 16-8-04, and the second requirement was met only w.e.f. 1-1-05, the appellants are not liable to pay any Service tax in respect of Consulting Engineers Services received from abroad for the impugned period to 1-1-2005. 4. S....