2023 (4) TMI 591
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sunil Mishra, ASC [CT & GST] ORDER This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. The present writ petition is being entertained only because the Second Appellate Tribunal has not yet been constituted. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the 1st appellate order dated 24.02.2023 passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... this writ petition. 5. Mr. Sunil Mishra, learned Addl. Standing Counsel vehemently contended that since there is delay in preferring the appeal, this Court may not be in a position to condone the delay beyond four months, particularly when appellate authority has not been vested with discretion to condone the delay beyond one month after lapse of three months from the date of communication of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e provisions of law by approaching 2nd appellate tribunal, which has not yet been constituted and, as such, learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that at the stage of first appeal, 10% of the tax has already been deposited, as an interim measure, it is directed that the penalty and interest amount demanded by the authority shall remain stayed during the pendency of the writ petition....
TaxTMI