AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (4) TMI 552
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eya Dahiya, Advocates for the respondent Shri Ameet Singh and Ms. Bhawna, Advocates for Designated Authority Shri Nagendra Yadav, Authorised Representative for the Central Government ORDER JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA : All these four anti-dumping appeals seek the quashing of the final finding dated 07.09.2021 issued by designated authority and consequential customs notification dated 06.12.2021 issued by Central Government imposing anti-dumping duty on flat rolled products of aluminium. 2. The necessary interested parties had not been impleaded as respondents in these four appeals. In view of the request made by learned counsel for the appellants time was granted to move appropriate applications for impleading the remaining intere....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....respondents. On October 31, 2022, the matter could not be taken up and was adjourned to November 01, 2022 on which date again the learned counsel for the respondent sought an adjournment for moving an appropriate application. On November 02, 2022, a detailed order was passed since the application had not been filed. The said order is reproduced below:- "Though on the earlier occasions the four appellants had stated that appropriate applications will be moved for impleading the remaining interested parties as respondents in the appeals but when the matter has taken up, today, it is noticed that applications have not been filed. Shri. Rohan Shah, learned counsel appearing for the appellant assisted by Shri Alok Yadav, states that app....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... or respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant has stated that some time may be given to move a better application. 5. As noted above, the matter had been repeatedly adjourned from September 14, 2022 till date and inspite of a specific order having been passed, the appellant has not filed a proper application. 6. Though the prayer for adjournment has been strongly opposed by Shri S. Seetharaman, learned counsel for respondent No. 3, in the interest of justice, we adjourn the matter to November 09, 2022. List on November 09.2022." 5. Though, time was sought by learned counsel for the appellants to move a better application, but such application, was not filed in these four appeals and Shri Alok Yadav, lea....