Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (3) TMI 1356

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Income Tax : Ms. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Sr. Standing Counsel Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 27-03-2023 The petitioner is a Government Company incorporated under the Companies Act. It is said to be a joint venture between the Government of India and Government of Bihar. 2. The present writ application has been filed putting to challenge an order dated 31.05.2022 passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Bihar and Jharkhand) whereby the petitioner's application under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "Act") requesting condonation of delay and permission to file the return of income for the assessment year ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he delay in submission of return. The said power, depending upon the amount of claims, has been conferred upon various authorities of the income tax. 7. In the present case, Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Department was vested with the power of acceptance/rejection of an application for condonation of delay and accordingly the impugned order has been passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner, Income Tax. 8. Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi has submitted that the expression "Genuine Hardship" has been explained by the Supreme Court in case of B. M. Malani Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax and Anr. reported in (2008) 306 ITR 196 (SC) to be genuine difficulty. He has submitted that the Principal Chief Commissioner ought to have taken not....