2008 (7) TMI 242

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri A.R. Madhav Rao, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per P.K. Das, Member (J) (for the Bench)]. - The Revenue filed this appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 401 /CE/CHD/04 dated 31-5-04 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chandigarh whereby "Pushpadi tail" was classified under sub-heading No. 3003.39 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and set aside ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3003.39. 3. Learned advocate on behalf of the respondents submits that the respondent filed appeal against the order of the Tribunal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. He further submits that Hon'ble Supreme Court set aside the Tribunals order as reported in 2005 (182) E.L.T. 290 (S.C.). It has been held that 'Lal tail' is medicament and is classifiable under Chapter 30. We find that the main c....