Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (3) TMI 894

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....002. As per the prosecution story, Shri Kunal Kumar S/o Shri Lallu Patel resident of Mohalla -Rambagh P.S.-Mithanpura District-Muzaffarpur has lodged a complaint before the police authority on 22.12.2016 regarding the misuse of bank accounts having nos. (1) 661010034681 held with Kotak Mahindra Bank, Muzaffarpur & Account No. (i) 133005500452, (ii) 133001502974 & (iii) 030605500653held with ICICI Bank, Muzaffarpur, which were fraudulently opened by his employer Raj Kumar Goenka and his brother Ashok Kumar Goenka without his knowledge and consent. On the basis of the said complain, an FIR No. 298/16 dated 22.12.2016 was lodged at Police Station Mithanpura, Muzaffarpur, against Raj Kumar Goenka and Ashok Kumar Goenka, both S/o Pashupati Nath....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he sum and substance of the present case, it is clear that it was Raj Kumar Goenka who was managing the entire affair and in that circumstance, the allegations were made against him. However, after refusal of anticipatory bail Raj Kumar Goenka finally went into judicial custody and took the path of bail vide Cr. Misc. No.5378 of 2021 on 31.05.2021. So far as the other accused person Ratan Kumar Goenka is concerned, his anticipatory bail vide Cr.Misc. No.25531 of 2021 was rejected on 05.07.2022 with an observation that he should also take the route of Raj Kumar Goenka. However, being aggrieved he moved before the Supreme Court of India in Cr. Appeal (SLP)(Crl.) No.7106 of 2022 (Ratan Kumar Goenka vs. Union of India) in which the Hon'ble Ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cumstance of the case as also the orders passed in case of the two accused persons namely Raj Kumar Goenka and Ratan Kumar Goenka and is of the belief that since both the aforesaid persons have been extended relief, although Raj Kumar Goenka had to take recourse to bail while Ratan Kumar Goenka succeeded before Hon'ble Apex Court, the case will continue and ultimately the accused persons including the petitioner herein will have to face the music, this Court is inclined to grant him the same relief with conditions. Let the petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Sub-ordinate court within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,00,000/-(Rupees Ten Lac....