2006 (9) TMI 177

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....SDR, for the Appellant. Shri P.C. Anand, C.A., for the Respondent. [Order per P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - This application filed by the department (appellant) is for condonation of delay of their appeal. The impugned order was received by the appellant on 14-10-2005. An appeal against the same should have been filed before 14-1-2006. The present appeal was filed on 17-4-2006, with a delay of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3. Learned SDR reiterates the above averments contained in the application, and also refers to para 2 of the grounds of appeal. Learned Consultant for the respondents opposes this application, by submitting that the delay of the appeal has not been satisfactorily explained by the appellant. 4. After examining the records and considering the submissions, we are at our wits end in the matter of ....