2023 (3) TMI 863
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Smt. Vachespathi RAMA PRABHAKAR, Advocate For the Respondents : Sri E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) ORDER 1. In this petition, petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned order dated 03.05.2022 at Annexure-H and for the reliefs. 2. Heard Smt. Vachespathi Rama Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. In addition to reiterating....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as such, petitioner is before this Court by way of present writ petition. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed 6. On perusal of the material on record, in particular, the application for condonation of delay dated 14.12.2021 filed by the petitioner, its is clear that the petitioner has s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the impugned order and permit the petitioner to file the returns within a period of thee weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. In the result, I Pass the following: ORDER (i) Petition is hereby allowed (ii) Impugned order dated 03.05.2022 passed by respondent No. 2 vide Annexure-H is set aside (iii) Petitioner is permitted to file the ret....
TaxTMI