2008 (8) TMI 109

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. [Order] - This application filed by the appellants says that there is a mistake apparent from the record, in Final Order No. 1269/07 dated 16-10-2007 passed by this Bench in the captioned appeal. In the said final order, the Apex Court's judgment in Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur v J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. [2004] (171) E.L.T. 289 (S.C)] was followed and the appellants we....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....MODVAT/CENVAT credit on inputs (explosives, lubricating oils etc.) is concerned, the matter is squarely covered by the decision of this court in the case of Vikram Cement v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore reported in 2006 (194) E.L.T.3 (S.C.). Therefore, the appeals where credit on inputs is concerned, are allowed." On this basis, it is submitted that Final Order No. 1269/07 needs to be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s was held to be prospective in operation. According to the learned SDR, the appellants are barred by limitation from taking the MODVAT credit in question in view of the aforesaid amendment to Rule 57G coupled with the decision of the Apex Court in Osram Surya case. 2. After giving careful consideration to the submissions, I find that the decision of the Apex Court in Vikram Cement cases was no....