2008 (11) TMI 59
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Yadav, Departmental Representative, for the Revenue, [Order per P.K. Das, Member (Judicial)] - Common issue is involved in these appeals and, therefore, all are being taken up together for disposal. 2. The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that Appellant No.1 is engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods for automobile industry. Appellant No. 2 is a foreign based company situated at....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Order-in-Appeal dated 21.2.2006 before the Tribunal, being Appeal No.138-139 of 2006, which are being taken up for hearing for disposal. 3. During the pendency of the above appeals before the Tribunal, the adjudicating authority passed de novo adjudication order dated 26.12.2006 and confirmed the demand of tax and penalties as earlier adjudication order. The Commissioner (Appeals) by Order-in-App....