2023 (2) TMI 495
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....isions)<br>Dated:- 8-2-2023<br>W.P.No.24834 of 2015 And M.P.Nos. 1 and 2 of 2015 - -<br>Customs<br>Honourable Dr.Justice Anita Sumanth For the Petitioners : Mr.R.M.D.Nazarullah For the Respondents : Mr.Venkataswamy Babu SCGPC ORDER Heard Mr.R.M.D.Nazarullah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Venkataswamy Babu, learned SCGPC for the respondents. 2. The petitioner was engaged ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on not be initiated under the provisions of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 for the reason that the export obligations had not been satisfied by it within the time stipulated under the Scheme. 5. The petitioner responded pointing out that it had not utilized the licence despite which an order came to be passed on 30.03.2005 to the effect that it was liable for customs d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ted 23.11.2007 of the Foreign Trade Development Officer, Office of ZJDGFT, Chennai - 6. Consequent upon the Adjudication Order No. 11/48/07-08/ECA.1 dated 12-09-2007 passed by the Office of the DGFT, New Delhi on the above EPCG Licence, we have been directed by the Foreign Trade Development Office, Office of ZJDGFT, Chennai, vide his aforesaid letter (copy enclosed), to pay the Customs Du....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g to the present litigation has transpired. Instead of simply informing the petitioner as to the quantum of outstanding demand, the officer has passed a second order in original on 06.02.2013. There was absolutely no necessity for the aforesaid order to have been passed as the same cause of action had been addressed vide orders dated 30.03.2005 and 11.09.2007. 10. Be that as it may, the petitio....
TaxTMI