Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (12) TMI 6

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p Sapra for the Appellant. Ms. Prem Lata Bansal with Mr. Mohan Prasad Gupta and Ms. Anshul Sharma for the Respondent. JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) - This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.10.2007 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.2556/Del/2005 pertaining to the assessment year 2001-02. The learned couns....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the appellant was not entitled to deduction under Section 80 HHC of the said Act on the interest earned on FDRs amounting to Rs 82,370/- ?" 2. Insofar as the proposed question No.1 is concerned, the counsel for the appellant as well as the counsel for the respondent / revenue agree that the same stands covered in favour of the ass....