2008 (9) TMI 80
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r (T) Smt. G. Dhana Madhri, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri V.V. Hariharan, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - After examining the records and hearing both sides, we are of the view that the appeal itself requires to be summarily disposed of. Accordingly, after dispensing with pre-deposit, we take up the appeal. 2. The appeal is against demand of se....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....also, who submits that the case may at best be remanded to the authorities below, who apparently did not examine all the submissions of the party. After examining the records of the case, we do not think that a remand is warranted in this case inasmuch as the authorities below chose to sustain the demand of service tax raised in the show-cause notice, regardless of the fact that construction of in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....efined under clause (91a) of Section 65 of the Act, which is as follows :- "(91a) "residential complex" means any complex comprising of - (i) a building or buildings, having more than twelve residential units; (ii) a common area; and (iii) any one or more of facilities or services such as park, lift, parking space, community hall, common water supply or ef....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fact is also clear from the photographs shown to us. In any case, it appears, the law makers did not want construction of individual residential units to be subject to levy of service tax. Unfortunately, this aspect was ignored by the lower authorities and hence the demand of service tax. In this view of the matter, we are also not impressed with the plea made by the appellants that, from 1-6-2007....
TaxTMI